![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| ![]() |
||||
| HOME | ABOUT | CONTACT | ADVERTISE | ||
![]() |
During World War II, Gropius and Conrad Wachsmann tried and failed to build prefab war housing in America. Buckminster Fuller gave it a shot with his 'Wichita House,' building a total of one. A critic dubbed it "Fuller's glorified grain bin." In 1950, even the builder of the now-legendary Lustron house -- which was steel-framed with enameled paneling -- went bankrupt. There have been successes, of course, though few were modern in style. More than 200,000 prefab units were turned out for worker housing during World War II by dozens of builders. A century earlier, entrepreneurs who flocked to treeless San Francisco to profit from the Gold Rush imported 5,000 prefab homes, including Colonials and Carpenter Gothics, from the East Coast and Europe, shipping many around the Horn. And who can forget the Sears Roebuck kit houses, built from roughly 1900 to 1940? The ubiquitous 'trailer,' later dubbed a 'mobile home,' remains an integral part of the American landscape, of course. But 'mobile homes' are not what architects mean when they talk about modern prefab. "It's a word nobody wants to use," says architect Bryant Yeh, whose Los Angeles firm Yeh + Jerrard has designed the prefab JoT house. Nobody, that is, except architect Jennifer Siegal, whose Office of Mobile Design in Los Angeles really does produce homes that can move from site to site. Siegal has said she's responding to the "new nomadism." "The early modernists put the prefabricated house at the center of their program of reform," Colin Davies observes in his book 'The Prefabricated Home.' "Architectural history may pretend otherwise, but the fact is that their prefabricated house projects all failed." Why? The federal government, which in time of crisis threw money at prefabs, repeatedly grew bored and turned off the tap, Davies notes. Several of the architects, including Wachsmann, seemed more interested in designing ideal prefabs than in their actual manufacture. And the few prefabs that were available couldn't compete against conventional stick-built tract homes, which likewise benefited from efficient, rationalized mass production.
Today, however, is different, proponents say. Technology has improved, quality manufacturers exist (many have been producing modular school rooms), and there is pent-up demand for modern, affordable architect-designed homes. The last time middle-class people could really afford custom modern homes, after all, was in the mid-1960s. Designers attribute the newfound interest in prefabs to the desire to save the planet through green design, design-savvy young people, and increasing housing costs that are forcing architects -- and buyers -- to come up with creative solutions. Kappe also believes that 'Dwell' magazine helped stimulate interest by sponsoring recent competitions for well-designed prefab houses, and having the winner built in North Carolina. 'Sunset' magazine also worked with Kaufmann on the 'Sunset' Breezehouse. 'Time,' 'Newsweek,' 'Business Week,' and other publications wrote about the new prefab designs. "The press has been wonderful," Kaufmann says. One thing that is not driving the newfound interest in prefab is a desire to produce something that's bargain basement. Chic, more than cheap, is what designers and buyers are after. "It's not really cheaper," architect Alan Koch says of prefab versus conventional construction, "but you get a better quality product for the same price." In a factory, Friedman says, conditions can be controlled, and workers more closely supervised than on the typical building site. The result, he says, is better quality. And on site, the homes go up quickly -- often in a day, if they are modular; longer, if they are panelized. Supplying what architects of the '50s and '60s called 'social housing' -- low-cost houses for workers or homeless people -- may not be the primary goal of the new prefabbers. But it is something that many hope to accomplish once production gears up. Instead, most architects' social concerns involve protecting the environment.
Prefab houses are kinder to the earth in part because they are smaller than conventional houses. "There are people who are attracted to the Mini-Cooper instead of the minivan," Koch says of his potential customers. "They are looking for something small and smart." There is also much less waste manufacturing homes in a factory than on site, Kaufmann says. And most prefab designers promise to site their houses to reduce energy use, and use sustainable materials and non-toxic paints, and many outfit their homes with solar panels. Wind turbines are an option on Kaufmann's designs; they are especially useful for housing in remote spots that are off the electrical grid -- including the monastery. Buyers include people who are committed to living easy on the earth, says Steve Glenn, the founder of LivingHomes. "I think there is a big chunk of people who care deeply about design and who care deeply about the health and sustainability of the products they buy, but currently buy homes that don't really reflect those values unless they have the time, money, and stress tolerance to do it themselves," Glenn says. "These houses fit people who love design and who love health and sustainability," he says. "The group could be called the cultural creatives, the conscientious capitalists." Buyers are also people who would like a custom home, without the custom-home hassles or costs, he says. Not surprisingly, the new prefabbers are going after artists and those with an artistic sensibility. That's one reason Joshua Tree, a growing artists colony in the high desert east of Palm Springs, is home to several new prefab homes, with many more on the way, including houses that Bryant Yeh (of Yeh + Jerrard) and Alan Koch and Linda Taalman (of Taalman Koch Architecture) are building for their own use and to use as showpieces. Maxx Livingstone also plans to build Krisel prefabs in Joshua Tree, and Marmol Radziner has clients in town as well.
Taalman Koch, whose biggest project was an art gallery, Dia Beacon in upstate New York, exemplifies the architect-artist connection that underlies much of the revived interest in prefab. The firm has collaborated with a number of artists on art project 'houses,' including Chris Burden's ten-foot high 'Beehive Bunker' made of premixed cement bags. For its iT house, a striking, aluminum-framed box that is almost entirely glass, a degree of privacy and a whole lot of art are provided by patterned, one-of-a-kind, artist-designed vinyl film (what Taalman Koch calls 'outFITs') that attaches to the glass. One of their collaborating artists is Jim Isermann, who lives in an all-steel house in Palm Springs designed by Donald Wexler. "The owners are art collectors, and they got interested in the iT house because they wanted to collect some of his work," Koch says of his clients for the Isermann-decorated home. "They see the house as living artwork." But it's not just the art-centric who are potential customers. Kaufman says she and her husband got into prefab when they couldn't find an affordable home in the Bay Area. Bryant Yeh and his wife are facing a similar affordability gap in Southern California. "Housing prices are spiraling out of control," he says, "so architects are looking at prefab." Many of the new prefab homes are being built on small, urban infill lots, or in the hinterlands where land is relatively affordable. That explains the attraction of Joshua Tree. It's close enough to Los Angeles and San Diego, far less expensive than Palm Springs, and artistically cutting edge. "My theory about Joshua Tree is it's the new Malibu," Koch says. "It sounds like a crazy statement, but if you think about what Malibu was 60 years ago, it was the frontier, people had little beach shacks." Modular homes can be cost-effective in remote areas, like Joshua Tree, where the price of labor drives up the cost of conventional construction. But as prefab grows more popular, driving costs down, it will be able to compete everywhere, proponents say. "We believe currently that prefab homes are best suited in areas where building traditionally may not be feasible," says Michael Friedman of Maxx Livingstone. "Over time we think this will change and prefab will become more of a dominant force within the residential construction industry." Today, many buyers of modern prefab homes are seeking vacation homes. In the future, some say, buyers will include entry-level buyers seeking first homes. "I think the goal is to use this technique for affordable homes," Kappe says, "if you can get it down in price." That's why some architects and developers, including Kappe and LivingHomes, hope to produce entire communities or prefab housing, including condos, to achieve economies of scale. LivingHomes is considering a community of starter homes, Kappe says, and so is Taalman Koch. Yeh + Jerrard have a similar idea, Yeh says. "We're looking at building sustainable single-unit models that we can scale up, with the help of a developer. The payoff comes when you have economies of scale," he says. Architect Ray Kappe remains hopeful but, like Krisel, cautious. "We'll see where it goes," Kappe says. "There's just a limited demand for high design modern architecture. Hopefully it will take off." Sacramento's Streng Bros. dabbled with prefabricated homes in the 1980s, but without success. Why? See their 'Prefabricated Problems' story here. Photos: John Eng, Barry Sturgill, James Watts, Benny Chan; also courtesy Clifford Public Relations, LivingHomes, Marmol Radziner Prefab, Maxx Livingstone Modern Homes, Michelle Kaufman Designs, Office of Mobile Design, Social Blueprint, Taalman Koch Architecture, Yeh + Jerrard. iT House outFIT Illustrations: Conny Purtil, Barbara Bestor, Jim Isermann, Renee Petropoulos, Worthington/Kim |
||
California's prefab crop:
|
|
2. LivingHomes: the LivingHome
What: Ray Kappe designed the first line of homes for LivingHomes. "Not
making it look like a prefab space was one of our goals," says Steve Glenn, the
company's founder.
|
|
3. Marmol Radziner Prefab: the Desert House
What: The Desert House is a prototype for Marmol Radziner's modular
homes.
|
|
4. Michelle Kaufman Designs: the Breezehouse
What: The Sunset Breezehouse (1,890 to 2,470 square feet); the Sidebreeze
(2,500 square feet); the Glidehouse (672 to 2,255 square feet). More designs are
on the way.
|
|
5. Maxx Livingstone Modern Homes: the Krisel Butterfly
What: Maxx Livingstone plans a line of prefab houses designed by William
Krisel, based on his designs from the 1950s and '60s for the Alexanders of Palm
Springs.
|
|
6. Yeh + Jerrard: the JoT House
What: The JoT House (name comes from 'Joshua Tree')
|
|
7. Office of Mobile Design: the Swellhouse
What: Several designs, including the Swellhouse, Portable Home, and the
Take Home, by architect Jennifer Siegal
| ![]() |
|
|